Coronet – "Needed: A Gambler's Anonymous"
JWGA-034
APPROVED FOR RESEARCH ACCESS
Owner-authorized historical and educational research access. This record is connected to its verified OCR text, searchable scan, metadata, and research chunks.
- Date
- April 1948
- Creator / publisher
- Michael Evans / Coronet
- Format
- Magazine article
- Physical status
- Original period publication / scan documentation
- Provenance
- Addie Williams family papers / archive press file
- Historical significance
- Powerful precursor/context piece showing the idea of a "Gamblers Anonymous" solution existed before the 1957 fellowship.
- Curatorial note
- Use as supporting context, not as a Jim Willis/G.A. organizational artifact.
- Rights / privacy basis
- Owner-supplied collection; Recovery Speakers authorizes noncommercial historical and educational research access with source attribution and a responsive takedown policy.
Catalog description
Article arguing for an Alcoholics Anonymous-style response to destructive gambling nearly a decade before formal G.A. founding.
Read the document
Verified research document: OCR text, searchable PDF, metadata, and research chunks have passed storage and delivery checks.
Use your browser’s Find command to search the OCR text.
APRIL 25c¢ THIS PRINTING: OVER 2,500,000 COPIES For Every if American Family A NEW BUDGET PLAN TO BEAT HIGH PRICES See Page 3 by MICHAEL EVANS . NEEDED: A Gambler’s Anonymous Gambling has left a trail of disaster and heartbreak across the U. S., emphasizing the need for action against a national menace For mem’ry has painted this perfect day With colors-that never fade, ARJORIE WALKED SLOWLY up the M steps to the little bungalow in Hillside, bracing her shoulders as she fumbled in her handbag for the key. Anyway, she thought, the rent isn’t due for a week and Tom should be able to get another job. After all, he was a good salesman. People couldn’t help liking his pleasant smile and laughing Irish eyes. Maybe this would be a lesson to him—just as Mr. Brant, the dis- trict manager, had told her. “I’m sorry, young lady, that I can’t take Tom back. But I warned him after the last garnishment that if there was another, he would have to go.” She had pleaded with him, she had even cried. “No,” Brant said firmly. “Tom fave me his word last time that he would never make another bet. But he didn’t keep that pledge any more than the others. Maybe this will And we find, at the end of a perfect day, APRIL, 1948 _ The soul of a friend we’ve made. bring him to his senses at last.” She knew that Brant was right. Before they married, Tom swore he would give up the bookmakers. He meant it. But six months later he came home one night, flushed and excited. He made her close her eyes and slipped a ring on her finger—a big diamond solitaire. “But, Tommy, darling,” she said. “We can’t afford it!” Tom laughed. “‘A fellow gave me a sure tip on a race. I couldn’t re- sist. It won and here’s your ring.” Then there was the morning a month later. She looked at the dresser where she carefully laid her ring every night. It was gone. So was Tom. Frantically she called his office, but he was out for the day. When he came home that night there was a cold look in his eyes. ‘All right,” he told her roughly, ‘‘so I took the ring! I had to have it—to 35 pawn. Now go ahead and bawl me out.” She cried and went to her room. Later, Tom came in and they talked it out. He had been betting again. Finally he had to pawn the ring in order to pay the bookmaker. “But this is my ataze he prom- ised. ‘(Never again!” How many oe had she Beale that promise in the last six years: She had lost track. Well, maybe ‘losing his job would do it. Mean- time, she would have to figure out some way of paying bills until he ’went back to work. The story of this young couple may sound like cheap melodrama. But the truth is that this kind of - story, with minor variations, is be- ing repeated all over America every day. The truth is that Tom is a sick person. Yet few people realize that gambling, like alcohol, may be the neurotic symptom of a mal- adjusted personality. Let us, however, make one dis- tinction plain. There are two kinds of gambling. For millions of us, gambling is just an occasional amusement. We buy a chance on a. new car, play poker or bridge for low stakes. This is fun. But some people are different. They can’t stop betting for big stakes, no mat- ter how many pledges they take. What makes the problem even more acute is that gambling, al- most unnoticed, has grown into big business. In some form, it reaches: into almost every home in the coun- try. You can walk down main street in a small Kansas town and wonder where to buy a drink—but you can always find a drugstore selling punchboard chances or a cigar store with a poker-dice game. You 36 can pick up any phone in Min. seaudlis or Pittsburgh and make a bet on a basketball game—or call long distance if you happen to live out on the farm. res Our national income is better than $200,000,000,000 a year. And a substantial percentage of all we earntis being staked on races, dice, ginrummy, baseball, basketball and football pools, bingo, raffles, pinball games, sweepstakes tickets, bridge and poker. In addition, there is the “numbers game,” a racket which originated in Cuba and has become big business, particularly in metro- politan centers. a A particularly vicious phase of the “numbers game” is that run- ners who collect bets hang around schoolyards at recess time and en- courage youngsters to wager lunch pennies on a number. In some Eastern cities, cases of actual un- dernourishment have been uncov- ered among children playing the racket with their milk money. ow MANY AMERICANS gamble? One careful survey puts the number of petty gamblers at 40,- 000,000. A Gallup poll found that nearly one of three adults takes chances on church raffles, lotteries and bingo—compared to one in five who a cards for money. Last year, several million people went to the races. How many of these are neurotic addicts is not known, but the number is constantly rising. The effect of gambling on munic- ipal and state governments and police forces is such an everyday phenomenon that it hardly merits mention here. Nor is it just confined to big cities like Chicago, where the Capone gang used to reap as much CORONE? 4 5 il a as $25,000,000 a year in gambling rofits. : But gambling not only corrupts jndividuals and governments — it reaches into industry. Last year - three foremen and 16 workers were fired and another 18 suspended in an effort to prevent the spread of betting hysteria at the Ford Motor Company. Some 9,000 men and women in one division were re- ported betting $300,000 a month. | At that rate, wagering in the River Rouge plant would total $2,000,000 a month for 65,000 workers. Big as these problems are, the human tragedies are even greater. The list of suicides, wrecked fami- lies, children condemned to near- starvation, lost jobs, divorces, heart- break and ruined lives is endless. For the grim fact is that gambling can hit anyone, anywhere. Last winter, in St. Petersburg, Florida, a widow from Iowa ar- rived with $100,000 — proceeds from the sale of her farm. She in- vested $20,000 in a rooming house and settled down. A favorite St. Petersburg pastime is shuffleboard. The widow started playing with a retired Army colonel as partner. In shuffleboard tournaments the players usually bet on themselves. By February the widow was betting as much as $500 on a game and losing quite often. By April she pad lost her $80,000 nest egg and ad mortgaged her house. In an- other month she had lost the house, and a few days later took an over- dose of sleeping pills. ~ Why do things like this happen? Why do shrewd, intelligent. indi- viduals deliberately put their for- tunes in jeopardy? There is a famous gambling ca- APRIL, 1948 See sino in Las Vegas, Nevada, that caters to Hollywood stars and other celebrities. It is all glitter and color, soft music and elegance. Most of the men and women are in evening dress, and in front of them on the tables, thousands of dollars change hands on each spin of the roulette wheel. Everywhere there is an at- mosphere of regal luxury—but the most fascinating sight is the faces - of the players. At one table you see a pale, steel- jawed man, a professional gambler. He bets steadily, his eyes narrow slits which watch the wheel. Beside him is a promising young starlet from Hollywood, blonde and hand- some. You can see her knuckles whiten when she clutches the table as the wheel spins. A few places down is a birdlike little woman in her sixties, whose evening dress went out of style be- fore the war. She has a small note- book in which she carefully makes notations after each spin of the wheel. From time to time she places a small bet. Win or lose, she jots her “system” in the book. Further down the table js a tall Westerner who has come into town from his ranch for the evening. He clumps his bets down loudly and you can hear his laugh when he wins. Pretty soon he stalks off, an- nouncing loudly that he is going to find a poker game where he “can get a little action.” You can see those same faces at your local movie theater on “Screeno” night. Those just there for an evening’s amusement are re- laxed, carefree and detached. Those infected by the gambling germ are gripped .by excitement, obvious or suppressed. They are persons pos- 37 sessed—in the clutch of forces be- yond their control. Listen to the comments of a New Jersey bookmaker, a quiet, intelli- gent man with a family, who has run a conservative bookmaking business for 20 years. “Most of my regular customers are business and professional peo- ple,” he says. “They get a kick out of betting and can afford to spend what they lose. But my problem is with the plunger. “I bats dentist who had bet with me for years. All of a sudden he started to bet very heavily. I tried to discourage him because I knew he was getting in over his head. But he veal age sm when I pointed out that it cost me a lot rin my business—$100 a week for protection, another $100 for racing results, plenty more for hones, clerks and accountants. I told him I paid all these bills—and still made money on the bad judg- ment of people like himself. “But he kept on plunging, until I told him I wouldn’t handle his bets any more. He got hysterical, but I wouldn’t argue. I suppose he shopped around and found another commissioner.” One common denominator runs through all these stories. People addicted to gambling do things which no person in his right mind would think of doing. Not long ago, a successful writer for popular magazines lost $100,000 in a Tia- juana gambling establishment. Why did he toss away five years savings? His explanation was that he felt sure he could win a million dollars and retire to a hacienda in the Yucatan. A middle-aged Indiana woman 38 was brought into court for neglect- | ing her children, Asked why she spent all her time in bingo parlors and “screeno” theaters, she said: “Something gets a hold on me. I begin to get excited. Every day | am sure that I am going to win, Then, if I lose, I feel sure that next time I will win.” : Recently, the assistant teller in an Illinois bank was found short $5,200 in his accounts. He had be- longed to a poker club—a small game” with a 25-cent limit so that “nobody will get hurt.” One night he had bad luck and kept ince ing his bets, trying to recoup Dis ae Next as he had a stack of 1OUs and took $50 out of the till, planning to replace it on payday: You know the rest . s « HY DO PEOPLE DO IT? The prob- Wiem is one of the most interest- ing in human psychology—and one of the least studied. Dr. Edmund Bergler of New York, one of the few psychiatrists who have analyzed the problem, calls the gambler a neurotic person —a person who cannot control his conduct. Bergler advances the star- tling conclusion that gamblers, un- consciously, really want to lose. Naturally, no gambler will admit this. But if you study a dozen case histories, you will find that almost always there was at least one point at which they could have quit while ahead of the game. But they nee do. They go on until they have = it r= ergler compares the neurotic gam- bee toa nanetKy child who defies his mother by saying, ““Look, I m spilling my cereal on the floor”’— -and then waits expectantly to be ami cna spanked. Apparently the child— ~ and the gambler—get pleasure out of “feeling bad.” This applies equally to the Des Moines housewife who loses her week’s grocery allowance playing bridge and to the tough-lipped St. Louis mobster who bets his roll in a back-room dice game. Neither is ever Satisfied. Eventually both lose. John Scarne, the New York ex- pert on gamblers and gambling, says flatly that the gambler never gives up. “‘Sure,” he says, “I know plenty who have ‘quit.’ I see them going around with long faces be- cause they have lost all their money. But they have only quit temporar- ily—just until they can get more money to play with.” What is the fascination of gam- bling? Fundamentally, it seems to be a combination of fear and hope. Suppose you are playing Blackjack. You get two cards and they total 14. Your point is 21. You decide to take another card. If you get a face card, it will “‘bust”’ your hand. But you “feel”? that it will be a seven. You watch the dealer drop the card. You pick it up carefully. You look at it cautiously. It is a seven! Suddenly you feel very powerful. Actually, pure chance gave you the - seven. Nothing you did changed the sequence of cards in the deck. But now that you have drawn the seven, your feeling is akin to omnipotence. You have controlled events ! This is very exciting business in- deed, and the gambling operators eighten the excitement. Why are children attracted by pinball sames? Because of flashing lights, Sputtering noises, moving figures— and the chance of winning ‘“some- thing for nothing.” In the gambling houses of Las _ Vegas and Palm Beach, the same principles are applied — luxury, deep carpets, money stacked care- lessly on the tables, perfume and music. At the fabulous Brazilian hotel at Quitandhina, the ceilings were recessed like bowls so that the whir of the roulette wheel and the click of the chips would re-echo through the room. The stage was — set for money . . . for winning . . . and losing... . It is plain that the rules for tempt- ing gamblers are well understood, but the problem of rehabilitating the psychotic gambler has thus far been almost untouched. Dr. Ber- gler has discovered that gamblers seldom, if ever, seek professional treatment. Occasionally, they are persuaded to see a consultant or psychiatrist, but they make difficult patients because they see nothing really wrong in gambling away their weekly pay check. One obvious suggestion has been made. Since Alcoholics Anonymous has achieved such great success with psychotic drinkers, why not a “Gamblers Anoriymous” for psy- chotic gamblers? There may be merit in the idea, but both gam- blers and psychiatrists express grave doubts. One gambling professional laughs at the idea. “I know what would happen,” he says. ““You would get some fel- lows together to talk about gam- bling and the first thing you know, one of them would happen to have a pair of dice in his pocket and they would wind up shooting dice until the sun came up.” A psychiatric specialist is equally pessimistic. “Alcoholics Anonymous works because the members recog- 39 nize that they have a. problem. They want to be cured. But the gambler doesn’t think of himself as sick. He doesn’t recognize the fact that he has a problem.” Clearly, all the evidence now available indicates that no short- cut solution to “gambling fever” is likely to be found. Psychotic gam- bling is a disease—just as serious as psychotic drinking and possibly more widespread. Certainly it is less generally recognized as a dis- ease. The gambler who can’t quit is suffering from a deep-rooted per- sonality maladjustment. His con- duct should not be excused with remarks that “‘gambling seems to run in the Jones family,” or that “after all, he isn’t hurting anybody - but himself.” f i The remedy, first of all; is to” recognize that the psychotic gam- bler is not a normal person. He must be persuaded that for his own good and that of his family, he re- quires treatment—professional care. In most cases, this is a difficult | battle to win, but once the victim has been persuaded to consult a specialist, the first and most 1m- portant barrier has been cleared. However, after the treatment starts, do not expect miracles. Psy-| chiatrists frankly state that gam- bling is one of their more difficult | problems. Time is one of the great | aids—time and understanding. _ C be LincoIn’s Most Remarkable Victory N THE DAY OF THE presidential O election in 1864, when Gen. George B. McClellan was running against Abraham Lincoln, the Confederates were hoping against hope that Lincoln would be de- feated, for McClellan had called the war a failure. Authorities at a prison camp in South Carolina, where 10,000 Northern prisoners were incarcer- ated, decided to take a “bean vote” among these Union soldiers, thinking it would give them some indication of how the Yankees were voting. Bags of dried beans were distributed to the helpless, hungry Northerners with instruc- tions to drop a black bean in the voting bag hung just inside the stockade if they were for Lincoln, and a white bean if they favored the election of McClellan. 40 Just before the voting began, the Confederate colonel in charge of the stockade announced to the prisoners: “If a majority of votes . — is cast for McClellan you will get extra rations today.” Then the Union prisoners— shrunken shadow-shapes of men, hundreds of whom took sick and died every week—were marched to the bean-casting bag. Many — were too weak from hunger and disease to cast their votes. But when the votes were counted, the Confederates found that the promise of extra rations was not enough to change the allegiance of those Northern prisoners, even when they knew their “bean vote” would have no influence on the outcome of the real election. Mc- Clellan got only 1,500 votes while Lincoln received more than 6,000! —Tue Rev. Puivip JEROME CLEVELAND CORONE Desay of te Lneing Debuluntes by LAWRENCE LADER You've probably never heard of Meyer Davis, yet he’s America’s best-paid dance maestro lon ’ tors. Y, we Davis, WHO HAs supplied the music for Presidents, bank- } ers, debutantes and dowagers for the last 35 years, is the greatest paradox, both social and economic, among our orchestra maestros. Other leaders like Gene Krupa or | Tommy Dorsey achieve popularity through the radio and juke boxes. Davis plays only at exclusive private parties where a mere 75 guests may be dancing to his 100-piece orches- | tra, While Krupa’s and Dorsey’s bread-and-butter depends on mil- | lions of ardent worshipers from Glens Falls to Keokuk, Davis’ fans are mostly confined to the imposing mansions of New York, Philadel- ees Washington, Newport, Bar ag and Palm Beach. € has never been mobbed b Pobby-soxers on a theater stage - Catured in a Hollywood offering. = never even been stopped € street by autograph collec- et Davis’ fortune was amassed | While most of today’s top bandsmen Were still j 1 wy ay in knee pants, and he will still be adding to his APRIL, 1948 hoard when most of them retire. Small as they are in numbers, Davis’ fans are unabashedly de- vout. They look upon this genial, ruddy-cheeked man of 55 as a god | of the rumba, fox trot, waltz and tango. The demand for his music is SO great during the Eastern debu- tante season that he often plays at three or four places in one night. Davis’ admirers want him so much, in fact, that he is paid more for a single night’s work than any other orchestra leader in the busi- ness. In 1946, he received $12,500 from Peter A. B. Widener ILI. For another Widener party a few years ago, the fee was $10,500; Ralph Beaver Strassburger has paid him $10,000, Clarence Geist $7,500. With a gross income of more than $50,000,000 in the last 35 years, Davis is easily the top money-maker in the dance-music world. Why Davis, who is almost un- known outside of Park Avenue or Philadelphia’s Main Line, should receive $12,500 a night while “big- name” bands like Krupa’s or Dor- 41
Preferred archival citation
Coronet – "Needed: A Gambler's Anonymous", April 1948, JWGA-034, The Jim Willis & Early Gamblers Anonymous Collection, Recovery Speakers.
